+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5
1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 55

Thread: Updated news regarding NiMH 4200 cell faults.

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Administrator Rob Fitzgerald has a level 1 reputation Rob Fitzgerald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    BG
    Posts
    3,965
    Blog Entries
    3

    Updated news regarding NiMH 4200 cell faults.

    Updated news regarding NiMH 4200 cell faults.

    The Intellect Battery Co. have now supplied the following cell Batch No's., which may contain cells that could explode when subjected to ‘race type’ conditions :-

    ARAET, AZCWT, BNCWT, BNDST, BRAET, BZAWT.

    We must stress that the Batch No's. detailed have been compiled only from returns by European customers to Intellect. There may be other batches that we have not yet been notified of. (So, do not assume that if a Batch No. is not detailed above, that it does not have any problem cells within it). Some EU drivers obtain cells directly from USA, etc. and it is possible that batches outside the EU could also be affected which have not been notified to us.

    Intellect supply the same cell in 'Customer designed shrink'. Intellect has not confirmed if the same Batch Codes are used on these versions of cells. Most of the reports that have been received appear to be relating to cells in the Intellect shrink. Hopefully the above information will cover most of the problems.

    This info kindly provided by Paul Worsley - BRCA Electric Board

  2. #2
    Guest Member mark barord has a level 1 reputation
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Basildon
    Posts
    634
    Does this mean we cannot use these cells or that we need to be careful when using these batch numbers?

  3. #3
    Guest Member Mike Haswell has a level 1 reputation
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Hillingdon
    Posts
    648
    Be Extremely careful with them.

  4. #4
    Guest Member spannersatcx has a level 1 reputation
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    384
    After seeing one catch fire and explode at Don Valley Sunday (first time I've seen/heard one go) I'm ditching all my IB's and sticking with EP, just not worth the risk in my opinion.

  5. #5
    RaceChat Supporter PDW has a level 1 reputation
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Derby, England
    Posts
    5,786
    Can someone tell us where to find the batch number? Fine toothcomb deployed on all my IBs, but haven't found a marking resembling the guidance above. Thanks.

    It's all very well ditching the IBs, but that doesn't give you any licence to go ape with EPs. Taking the EB advice whatever the make of NiMh cell would be prudent, and reduce whatever the risks really are. HTH
    'PJ' Winton

  6. #6
    Guest Member sion wedley has a level 1 reputation
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Wrexham
    Posts
    84
    Quote Originally Posted by spannersatcx View Post
    After seeing one catch fire and explode at Don Valley Sunday (first time I've seen/heard one go) I'm ditching all my IB's and sticking with EP, just not worth the risk in my opinion.
    The pack that went up on sunday was due to the charger and not the cells.
    by the way the cells wernt one of the batch codes that have had problems in the above post.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by sion wedley View Post
    The pack that went up on sunday was due to the charger and not the cells.
    What exactly happened on Sunday? Can you give more info so we know what went wrong?

  8. #8
    Guest Member sion wedley has a level 1 reputation
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Wrexham
    Posts
    84
    Quote Originally Posted by David Allen View Post
    What exactly happened on Sunday? Can you give more info so we know what went wrong?
    the cells were being charged on a pro track charger, the 20amp version ver 10. something i think???

    the cells had been charged up the day before and getting re-peaked for the race at 5.5amp with 3mv delta peak

    iv been told that the mah had gone over 1500mah and the cells started to vent, obviously the charger hadnt detected the peak voltage and carried on charging regardless

    the cells were took off charge at this point and placed on the steps at the side of the pitting area just in case anything happend

    then one of the cells went BANG!!!

  9. #9
    Guest Member learnerdriver has a level 1 reputation
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Bedford
    Posts
    445
    Quote Originally Posted by sion wedley View Post
    the cells were being charged on a pro track charger, the 20amp version ver 10. something i think???

    the cells had been charged up the day before and getting re-peaked for the race at 5.5amp with 3mv delta peak

    iv been told that the mah had gone over 1500mah and the cells started to vent, obviously the charger hadnt detected the peak voltage and carried on charging regardless

    the cells were took off charge at this point and placed on the steps at the side of the pitting area just in case anything happend

    then one of the cells went BANG!!!
    Note
    1. the cells were being re peaked
    2. the cells were being charged at more than 1C

  10. #10
    Global Moderator Mark Christopher has a level 1 reputation Mark Christopher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Near Doncaster
    Posts
    8,286
    Quote Originally Posted by sion wedley View Post
    the cells were being charged on a pro track charger, the 20amp version ver 10. something i think???

    the cells had been charged up the day before and getting re-peaked for the race at 5.5amp with 3mv delta peak

    iv been told that the mah had gone over 1500mah and the cells started to vent, obviously the charger hadnt detected the peak voltage and carried on charging regardless

    the cells were took off charge at this point and placed on the steps at the side of the pitting area just in case anything happend

    then one of the cells went BANG!!!

    no they went BANG!
    Dremel - Traktech -Xray - MBModels Leeds - RCDisco - Nova Rossi - RRCI - Edam - Serpent UK

  11. #11
    Global Moderator spmcc has a level 1 reputation spmcc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Stacksford, Norfolk
    Posts
    2,698
    Blog Entries
    1
    When you say the charger. Do you mean the dickhead who set a device to charge at over the recommended charge rate. Because that's who is the charger. The thing putting in the charge is just a device being used by the charger.
    Last edited by spmcc; 19-11-2007 at 09:27 PM.
    Jon Guest - Litemodz, www.spmcc.org.uk
    GOM and now a TOG and proud of it

  12. #12
    RaceChat Supporter PDW has a level 1 reputation
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Derby, England
    Posts
    5,786
    Matt, thanks, also had a PM giving the same information. On cells with the original IB label, I found the batch code. However...

    On my other cells, there is no batch code; they have the distributor's heat shrink. I peeled off the matcher's label in my search, and found a panel with some instructions on it. Amongst the points about not connecting them backwards and using a specific charger, and not incinerating or short-circuiting them... I found a line that reads "Do not... ...solder to battery directly."

    I appreciate this advances the knowledge of these incidents not one jot, and I am not trying to shift blame away from anyone (least of all me) who ignores the instructions given - I agree with Jon, the charger/cell-carer is the person setting the devices, not the devices. But when so many people are asking where to get advice from, it doesn't seem to smart to me to cover the advice with a very official-looking label that hides the pertinent points.
    'PJ' Winton

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5
1 2 3 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts